Advances in Social Behavior Research

Advances in Social Behavior Research

Vol. 3, 01 March 2023

Open Access | Article

The Relationship Between Co-Rumination on Social Media and Internalized Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Balanced Time Perspective

Mengxin Zhang * 1 , Yexuan Liu 2
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Xueyuan Road, Beijing, China
2 Department of Humanities Management and Information Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Humanities Research, Vol. 3, 437-445
Published 01 March 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Mengxin Zhang, Yexuan Liu. The Relationship Between Co-Rumination on Social Media and Internalized Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Balanced Time Perspective. LNEP (2023) Vol. 3: 437-445. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022541.


Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have implemented stringent preventative measures. Individuals impacted by quarantine policies have become more reliant on cell phones to interact with others. It is still uncertain whether recurrent internet talks of one's struggle aggravate anxiety and despair in individuals. This study investigated the effects of social media-based co-rumination on mental health. In this study, 352 Chinese participants were recruited online, took the online test, and returned 309 valid surveys. There were 127 men and 182 women among them. The researchers looked into the relationship between respondents' co-rumination, balanced time perspective, anxiety, and depression. The study discovered that persons under quarantine had higher levels of co-rumination, but this did not result in more acute anxiety or despair. The unbalanced time perspective negatively moderated the association between the two variables, but the balanced time perspective had no moderating impact. The cognitive style of co-rumination predicted psychological disorders negatively.


internalizing symptoms., balanced time perspective, co-rumination


1. Du, J., Mayer, G., Hummel, S., Oetjen, N., Gronewold, N., Zafar, A., & Schultz, J. H. (2020). Mental Health Burden in Different Professions During the Final Stage of the COVID-19 Lockdown in China: Cross-sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res, 22(12), e24240. doi:10.2196/24240

2. O'Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054

3. Steers, M.-L. N., Wickham, R. E., & Acitelli, L. K. (2014). Seeing everyone else's highlight reels: How Facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 701-731. doi:10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.701

4. Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Dev, 73(6), 1830-1843. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00509

5. Stolarski, M., Wiberg, B., & Osin, E. (2015). Assessing Temporal Harmony: The Issue of a Balanced Time Perspective. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application: Essays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 57-71). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

6. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Alex Linley, P., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24-40. doi:10.1080/17439760903271181

7. Rose, A. J., Schwartz-Mette, R. A., Glick, G. C., Smith, R. L., & Luebbe, A. M. (2014). An observational study of co-rumination in adolescent friendships. Dev Psychol, 50(9), 2199-2209. doi:10.1037/a0037465

8. Spendelow, J. S., Simonds, L. M., & Avery, R. E. (2017). The Relationship between Co-rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother, 24(2), 512-527. doi:10.1002/cpp.2023

9. Calmes, C. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in Interpersonal Relationships: Does Co-rumination Explain Gender Differences in Emotional Distress and Relationship Satisfaction Among College Students? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4), 577-590. doi:10.1007/s10608-008-9200-3

10. Felton, J. W., Cole, D. A., Havewala, M., Kurdziel, G., & Brown, V. (2019). Talking Together, Thinking Alone: Relations among Co-Rumination, Peer Relationships, and Rumination. Journal of youth and adolescence, 48(4), 731-743. doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0937-z

11. Stone, L. B., Hankin, B. L., Gibb, B. E., & Abela, J. R. (2011). Co-rumination predicts the onset of depressive disorders during adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol, 120(3), 752-757. doi:10.1037/a0023384

12. Schwartz-Mette, R. A., & Rose, A. J. (2012). Co-rumination mediates contagion of internalizing symptoms within youths' friendships. Dev Psychol, 48(5), 1355-1365. doi:10.1037/a0027484

13. Zelic, K. J., Ciesla, J. A., Dickson, K. S., Hruska, L. C., & Ciesla, S. N. (2017). An Experimental Investigation of Co-rumination, Problem Solving, and Distraction. Behav Ther, 48(3), 403-412. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.013

14. Ioffe, M., Pittman, L. D., Kochanova, K., & Pabis, J. M. (2020). Parent-Adolescent Communication Influences on Anxious and Depressive Symptoms in Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolesc, 49(8), 1716-1730. doi:10.1007/s10964-020-01259-1

15. Dirghangi, S., Kahn, G., Laursen, B., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2015). Co-rumination cultivates anxiety: a genetically informed study of friend influence during early adolescence. Dev Psychol, 51(4), 564-571. doi:10.1037/a0038848

16. Byrd-Craven, J., Geary, D. C., Rose, A. J., & Ponzi, D. (2008). Co-ruminating increases stress hormone levels in women. Horm Behav, 53(3), 489-492. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.12.002

17. Murdock, K. K., Carlucci, L., & Balsamo, M. (2019). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Co-Rumination Via Cellphone Among Emerging Adults. 38(8), 671-703. doi:10.1521/jscp.2019.38.7.671

18. Battaglini, A. M., Rnic, K., Tracy, A., Jopling, E., & LeMoult, J. (2021). Co-rumination across in-person and digital communication: Associations with affect and relationship closeness in adolescents. J Adolesc, 89, 161-169. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.04.011

19. Keshishian, A. C., Watkins, M. A., & Otto, M. W. (2016). Clicking away at co-rumination: co-rumination correlates across different modalities of communication. Cogn Behav Ther, 45(6), 473-478. doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1201848

20. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. J Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.

21. Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., Jankowski, K. S., & Szymaniak, K. (2020). Deviation from the balanced time perspective: A systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109772. doi:

22. Åström, E., Seif, A., Wiberg, B., & Carelli, M. G. (2018). Getting "Stuck" in the Future or the Past: Relationships between Dimensions of Time Perspective, Executive Functions, and Repetitive Negative Thinking in Anxiety. Psychopathology, 51(6), 362-370. doi:

23. Zhang, Y., Xie, Z., Lv, G., Shen, S., & Li, P. (2021). Reliability evaluation of the Chinese short version of the common regurgitation questionnaire applied to 1354 nursing students J Shandong University Journal (Medical Edition). 59(07), 85-90+96.

24. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and Construct Validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. 27(4), 220-227. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000076

25. Rönnlund, M., Åström, E., & Carelli, M. G. (2017). Time Perspective in Late Adulthood: Aging Patterns in Past, Present and Future Dimensions, Deviations from Balance, and Associations with Subjective Well-Being. Timing & Time Perception, 5(1), 77-98. doi:10.1163/22134468-00002081

26. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life: Simon and Schuster.

27. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306

28. Zung, M. D., & William, W. K. (1971). A Rating Instrument For Anxiety Disorders. Psychosomatics, 12(6), 371-379. doi:

29. Frison, E., Bastin, M., Bijttebier, P., & Eggermont, S. (2019). Helpful or Harmful? The Different Relationships Between Private Facebook Interactions and Adolescents’ Depressive Symptoms. Media Psychology, 22(2), 244-272. doi:10.1080/15213269.2018.1429933

30. Guassi Moreira, J. F., Miernicki, M. E., & Telzer, E. H. (2016). Relationship Quality Buffers Association Between Co-rumination and Depressive Symptoms Among First Year College Students. J Youth Adolesc, 45(3), 484-493. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0396-8

31. Wang, X., Gao, L., Yang, J., Zhao, F., & Wang, P. (2020). Parental Phubbing and Adolescents' Depressive Symptoms: Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support as Moderators. J Youth Adolesc, 49(2), 427-437. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01185-x

32. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

33. Bareket-Bojmel, L., Shahar, G., Abu-Kaf, S., & Margalit, M. (2021). Perceived social support, loneliness, and hope during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Testing a mediating model in the UK, USA, and Israel. Br J Clin Psychol, 60(2), 133-148. doi:10.1111/bjc.12285

34. Grey, I., Arora, T., Thomas, J., Saneh, A., Tohme, P., & Abi-Habib, R. (2020). The role of perceived social support on depression and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113452. doi:

35. Tomich, P. L., & Tolich, A. (2019). Life is a balancing act: Deviation from a balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between lifetime trauma exposure and optimism. Current Psychology, 40(5), 2472-2480. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00191-3

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II
ISBN (Print)
ISBN (Online)
Published Date
01 March 2023
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
ISSN (Online)
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated