Advances in Social Behavior Research

Advances in Social Behavior Research

Vol. 1, 22 December 2021


Open Access | Article

Iran’s Nuclear Ambition

Haokai Li * 1
1 St. George Campus, University of Toronto

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Social Behavior Research, Vol. 1, 16-25
Published 22 December 2021. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Haokai Li. Iran’s Nuclear Ambition. ASBR (2021) Vol. 1: 16-25. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7102/1/ASBR_003.

Abstract

The relations between Iran and the Western world has been deteriorating in the recent years due to Iran’s nuclear development. Iran’s nuclear program was firstly sponsored by the U.S. and western world, but now they deemed Iran is threatening regional security and world stabilization with its nuclear ambition. When facing the abominable situation create by the U.S. and rest of the world, Iran had no choice but to continually strengthening its national security. Fairly to say, Iran's nuclear aim is both motivated by its internal intension to be recognized as a powerful state and the external pressure that provoked it to pursues national security. U.S. and the western world could not risk letting Iran become an effective regional power with its nuclear capability, while Iran could not turn away from the temptation to hold nuclear power. The existing confrontation between Iran and the U.S. is not going to vanish soon. However, the U.S. should understand the consequence and backlash of its sanctions, construct a new method to resolve the current situation.

Keywords

sanctions, Iran, nuclear development history, international relations, nuclear ambitions

References

1. Balan, G. (2013). The Latest United States Sanctions Against Iran: What Role to the WTO Security Exceptions? Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 18(3), 365-393. Retrieved May 7, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/26296265

2. Mousavian, S. H. (2006). Iran and the west: The path to nuclear deadlock. Global Dialogue, 8(1), 69-79. Retrieved

3. Mansour, I. (2008). Iran and instability in the middle east. International Journal, 63(4), 941-964. Retrieved from http://myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F220865 861%3Faccountid%3D14771

4. Wendt, Alexander (1992), Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics, International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

5. Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

6. Hansen, Lene (2012), Reconstructing desecuritisation: The normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it, Review of International Studies 38: 525–546.

7. Williams, Michael C. (2003), Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics, International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–531.

8. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde (1998), Security: A new framework for analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

9. Norris, Robert S. and Hans M. Kristensen (2010), Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945–2010, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 66(4): 77–83.

10. Waltz, Kenneth N. (2012), Why Iran should get the bomb: Nuclear balancing would mean stability, Foreign Affairs 91(4): 2–5.

11. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Relations (New York: McGraw Hill).

12. Müller, Harald (2010), Between power and justice: Current problems and perspectives of the NPT regime, Strategic Analysis 34(2): 189–201.

13. Bahgat, Gawdat (2015), Prospects for a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East, International Relations and Security Network (ISN), June 15, http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/specialinterest/gess/cis/center-for-securities￾studies/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/191392.

14. Moshirzadeh, H. (2007). Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607084999

15. Pashakhanlou, A. H. (2017). Realism and fear in international relations. In Realism and Fear in International Relations (pp. 1-21). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

16. Powell, R. (2015). Nuclear brinkmanship, limited war, and military power. International Organization, 589-626.

17. Farzanegan, M.R., (2013). Effects of International Financial-and-Energy-Sanctions on Iran's Informal Economy. SAIS Review of International-Affairs 33(1), 13-36. DOI:10.1353/sais.2013.0008.

18. Cheraghali, A.M. Impacts of international sanctions on the Iranian pharmaceutical market. DARUJ Pharm Sci 21, 64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-2231-21-64

19. Majidpour, M. (2015). The Unintended Consequences of US-led Sanctions on Iranian Industries. Iranian Studies, 46(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2012.740897

20. The World Bank (2019). The Islamic Republic of Iran. The World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview.

21. Mehta, R. N., & Whitlark, R. E. (2016). Unpacking the Iranian Nuclear Deal: Nuclear Latency and US Foreign Policy. The Washington Quarterly, 39(4), 45-61.

22. BBC News (2019). Six Charts that Show-How-hard-US Sanctions have hit Iran. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-48119109

23. Sanger, D. E., & Mazzetti, M. (2016). The US had a cyberattack plan if Iran's nuclear dispute led to conflict. The New York Times, 16.

24. Levis, P. (2015). Iran and Nuclear Restraint. Research Paper. Middle North Africa Program and International Security Department, 7.

25. Michael Herzog. Iranian Public Opinion-on-the-Nuclear Program: A Potential-Asset for the-International Community. The Washington Institute for Near East policy. June 2006. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/pubs/PolicyFocus56.pdf

26. Nancy Gallagher, Ebrahim Mohseni, Clay Ramsay, "Iranian Opinion on the Nuclear Agreement," CISSM Publication, September 2015. https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default/files/2019-07/CISSMPA%20Iranian%20Public%20Opinion%20on%20the%20Nuclear%20Agreement%20090915%20FINAL-LR.pdf

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2021)
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-04-1
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-05-8
Published Date
22 December 2021
Series
Advances in Social Behavior Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7102
ISSN (Online)
2753-7110
DOI
10.54254/2753-7102/1/ASBR_003
Copyright
22 December 2021
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated